| Technical feasibility and political viability are assessed based on proposal content and researcher track records. | Administrative operability is not systematically evaluated (e.g., authority, institutional commitment, staff capabilities, and organizational support). | Incorporate administrative operability indicators such as leadership commitment, administrative staff commitment, staff engagement, and resource availability into the evaluation criteria. |
| Evaluation focuses on technical outputs like publications, intellectual property, and prototypes. | The review process does not assess the organizational capacity to implement the project, which includes administrative readiness and institutional support. | Add an assessment of institutional and organizational support to ensure the feasibility of executing the proposed research, particularly for large-scale or long-term projects. |
| Political viability is considered through partnership evaluation. | No direct evaluation of stakeholder engagement and administrative support mechanisms. | Evaluate staff engagement and cross-functional collaboration to ensure successful policy and research implementation. |